<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bigger Love &#187; adultry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigger-love.com/tag/adultry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigger-love.com</link>
	<description>Information about Polyamory, Swinging, BDSM, Open Relationships and Alternative Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<div id='fb-root'></div>
					<script type='text/javascript'>
						window.fbAsyncInit = function()
						{
							FB.init({appId: null, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});
						};
						(function()
						{
							var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;
							e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';
							document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);
						}());
					</script>	
						<item>
		<title>Most adulterous professions</title>
		<link>http://www.bigger-love.com/2010/03/most-adulterous-professions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigger-love.com/2010/03/most-adulterous-professions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucius Scribbens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monogamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swinging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adultry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ashley madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human sexual behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swinger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigger-love.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AshleyMadison.com, the dating site for married people looking to cheat (do you hear &#8216;Escape&#8217; [the Pina Colada song] playing in the background? I do.) did a survey of the 1.9 million people who signed-up with them last year to see who cheats the most.  Here is their results: For Women: 1. Teachers 2. Stay-at-home Moms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><fb:like href='http://www.bigger-love.com/2010/03/most-adulterous-professions/' layout='button_count' show_faces='false' width='400' action='recommend' colorscheme='light' send='false' /></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a href="http://www.ashleymadison.com/" target="_blank">AshleyMadison.com</a>, the dating site for married people looking to cheat (do you hear<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugdF4vWn3I4" target="_blank"> &#8216;Escape&#8217; [the Pina Colada song]</a> playing in the background? I do.) did a survey of the 1.9 million people who signed-up with them last year to see who cheats the most.  Here is their results:</p>
<p><strong>For Women:</strong><br />
1. Teachers<br />
2. Stay-at-home Moms<br />
3. Nurses<br />
4. Administrative Assistants<br />
5. Real Estate Agents</p>
<p><strong>For Men:</strong><br />
1. Physicians<br />
2. Police Officers<br />
3. Lawyers<br />
4. Real Estate Agents<br />
5. Engineers</p>
<p>This really came as no surprise.  From being in the swinger lifestyle for many years we&#8217;ve noticed that teachers, those in the medical profession, Realtors and law enforcement personnel are highly overrepresented.  Over course swinging isn&#8217;t cheating, and our conclusion was that these are high stressed jobs and these people need to blow-off some steam.  They work hard, they play hard.  Niel Biderman of <a class="zem_slink" title="Ashley Madison" rel="homepage" href="http://www.ashleymadison.com/">Ashley Madison</a> mentions the same.</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.ejhs.org/volume3/swing/body.htm" target="_blank">study of 1187 swingers done by Bellermine University</a> in 2000 they found:</p>
<blockquote><p>The typical swinger in this study was 39 years old, had two years of college education, had been married 1.5 times, was in a current marriage lasting 10.5 years, and had been involved in swinging for 5 years. The subjects were predominately white at 90.4 percent of the sample.  African-American&#8217;s were 4.1 percent of those sampled, Hispanic&#8217;s were 3.0 percent, and 1.5 percent indicated &#8220;other&#8221;. Gender differences were minimal on all of these characteristics. Included in the sample were ten physicians, fifteen attorneys, sixty-five upper level managers or owners of businesses, twenty-seven engineers, twenty-two teachers, forty health professionals including nurses&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Sound like the typical Ashley Madison member?</p>
<p>My point here is that you can&#8217;t judge someone by the sex they have behind closed doors.  Everyone has a kink.  Anyone&#8217;s sex life, if it were made public, would shock and horrify someone else.  One person&#8217;s kink is another person&#8217;s vanilla sex.  What gets one person off does nothing for someone else.  Neither is more &#8216;right&#8217; than the other, it&#8217;s just &#8216;right&#8217; for that particular person.  Saying that one person is &#8216;better&#8217; than another, or is more &#8216;moral&#8217; or &#8216;ethical&#8217; in their dealings with others in business or public based upon their particular sexual preference in private, is simply stupid and a grossly inaccurate picture of who someone really is.</p>
<p>When (as mentioned in the previous post) as many as 20% of Americans have an open relationship some kind or another, chances are you come in contact with a swinger, a polyamorous individual, a cuckhold, a sadist or masocist, etc. on a daily basis and never know it.  Your doctor, your kid&#8217;s teacher, the police officer that just responded to the break-in call at your neighbor&#8217;s house, your neighbor, your best friend, a family member and those American soldiers you support all could be one of the above.  Their sexuality in no way dictates how they relate to their fellow men in a professional or social environment.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.momlogic.com/2010/02/who_cheats_teachers_docs_and_stay_at_home_moms_ashleymadisoncom.php#ixzz0gzOPeeTc" target="_blank">Link to article</a></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/10/most-adulterous-prof.html">Most adulterous professions</a> (boingboing.net)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.thestar.com/living/article/791851--the-new-wives-cheaters-club">The new wives&#8217; cheaters club</a> (thestar.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/3b318cf4-d1d2-4b12-a13a-12ffd273c261/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=3b318cf4-d1d2-4b12-a13a-12ffd273c261" alt=" Most adulterous professions"  title="Most adulterous professions" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution paragraph-reblog"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div class="shr-publisher-465"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigger-love.com/2010/03/most-adulterous-professions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

